Skip to main content
The Kitchen Archive

Eats Archive › Washington › Seattle

Seattle, WA

Etta's Seafood? Curious of opinions

5 posts · May 1, 1997 to May 23, 1997

CubWatchMay 1, 1997
    The few times we have eaten at Ettas, usually for a late breakfast or
 early lunch on Saturday or Sunday, we have found the food to be excellent.
  I particularly like their fried oysters, or their seafood omelett.
WaylandMay 6, 1997
 Went there a few months back.   Had probably the best salmon I've ever
 had.  Wonderful dinner.

 W
 >Jim F. wrote:
 >>
 >> Etta's seafood near Pike Place?  My gf and I ate here Saturday for
 >> lunch.  We thought the food was *awful*, just wondering what other
 >> people think of this place.
 >>
 >> Jim
 >
 >I had app's at Etta's last night and had mixed reactions. The fish cakes
 >extremely lacking of flavor will not be ordered by myself again. The
 >Calamari was pretty good and I would order it again. The Tamales are
 >quite good and I would go back there to order them again IMHO  R.
ALZELTMay 7, 1997
 Wayland wrote:

 >Subject:   Re: Etta's Seafood?  Curious of opinions
 >From:      [email removed] (Wayland)
 >Date:      Tue, 06 May 1997 18:26:35 GMT
 >
 >
 >Went there a few months back.   Had probably the best salmon I've ever
 >had.  Wonderful dinner.
 >
 >W
 >>Jim F. wrote:
 >>>
 >>> Etta's seafood near Pike Place?  My gf and I ate here Saturday for
 >>> lunch.  We thought the food was *awful*, just wondering what other
 >>> people think of this place.
 >>>
 >>> Jim
 >>

 Jim,

 Go there quite often. Enjoy it very much.

 alan
Jarrett P.University of WashingtonMay 8, 1997
 Sasha Y. wrote:

 >Make that 2 No votes. My partner and I ate there a month or so
 >ago and won't be going back. Considering the reputation this
 >place has, I expected much more.

 I think that this place has to deal, in part, with the a wide variety of
 reputations that precede it given Tom Douglas' not so subtle grandstanding
 and showmanship within the larger food community.  I've been to Etta's a a
 fair amount (15+) over the last few years, including their practice runs
 before they opened. Most often, when I or someone in the party has been
 disappointed, it's been the result of a misalignment between expectations
 and outcomes, as opposed to bad food....kind of what you get at below.

 >As someone pointed out, the
 >(ancho I believe) tamale was tasty as was the salmon topped
 >with a shiitake mushroom relish. That was my dish. I chose
 >asparagus to accompany the salmon and there was no flavor to
 >it other than being lightly steamed with a little olive oil
 >perhaps. My partner ordered the crab cakes, decent enough
 >but the *mountain* of french fries were a huge turnoff

 The Salmon your referring to -- Bainbridge Island (?) Salmon, smoked,
 lightly dusted with herbs, grilled over alder, served over bread pudding,
 and topped with shiitake relish -- remains the best Salmon I've ever had
 in any restaurant in this city.  Ray's has never come close.  Flying Fish
 doesn't cut it.  Campagne and Lamprea - IMO - venture too far into the
 land of particularity. Interestingly, this was also one of the few pieces
 of salmon I've ever encountered in this city that was properly cooked.

 You're right on about the crab cakes, the fries are clearly over the
 top...see below.

 >as were the plates, emblazoned with the "ettas" logo. Reminded
 >me of being at a coffee shop and I was immediately turned
 >off by the lack of ambience. We ordered dessert, more out
 >of curiosity than desire for more, and what we received
 >(again on "Etta's" plates) was semi-sweet chocolate fondue
 >with fruit and cookies. The coffee came in Etta's mugs
 >as well..

 You're comments here, again, are right on the mark.  I think some people
 lose sight of the fact that Tom D. had originally meant this place to be
 nothing too fancy, merely a "seafood joint", and a way to reclaim the old
 Cafe Sport space at the same time. The "Etta's" logo's seem like an
 attempt -- albeit self-indulgent -- to foster this "up-scale joint" like
 atmosphere.  I too question whether or not this really works in the end.

 >However, the service was quite good... This place
 >isn't terrible by any means but I don't believe that the
 >food supports the reputation this place has... I later
 >tried "Palace Kitchen", another of Tom Douglas' restaurants
 >and wasn't impressed either. What are others' comments on
 >"Palace Kitchen"?

 Again, the Palace Kitchen still seems to be struggling with it's identity.
 I went shortly after it opened and found it to be a pleasing, cafe-like
 approach to his Dhalia formula.  They were talking about building a wine
 cellar there and adding a cheese program (custom aged cheeses) all as part
 of Tom D's larger vision of the Palace as a "show-kitchen".  I think they
 were also talking about baking a lot of the TD-empire breads there too.
 Food was okay, but rather affordable.

 I went back last month and things had changed quite a bit.  Limos pulled
 up on a regular basis, the wait was 2-2.5 hours on a Friday night, the bar
 was packed with those there merely to "be seen", etc. The original prices
 had risen and the food didn't seem to taste any better.  For that matter,
 the preps and ingredients seemed, if anything, a little less focused. I
 was rather unimpressed.  Then again, it could still be the product of me
 expecting something a little different than what was being delivered.

 For what it's worth, Dhalia remains one of the most unique culinary
 destinations in the city.  Sure it's not the best, the fanciest, or most
 romantic, but where else can two people dressed in cut-off shorts feel
 perfectly comfortable building a tasting-dinner from such an eclectic, and
 largely well-executed, menu for under $60/couple ?

 -Jarrett
StoreyUWMay 23, 1997
 Someone wrote:

 > > >Anyone who is a regular there want to speculate as to why the divergence
 > > >of such strong opinions?
 > >
 > > Actually, there doesn't seem to be a "divergence of such strong opinions".
 > >
 > > All I've seen is the single negative comment above followed by 5 or 6
 > > equally short yes votes.  Kind of a dull thread in you really think about
 > > it.
 >
 > Make that 2 No votes. My partner and I ate there a month or so
 > ago and won't be going back. Considering the reputation this
 > place has, I expected much more. As someone pointed out, the
 > (ancho I believe) tamale was tasty as was the salmon topped
 > with a shiitake mushroom relish. That was my dish. I chose
 > asparagus to accompany the salmon and there was no flavor to
 > it other than being lightly steamed with a little olive oil
 > perhaps. My partner ordered the crab cakes, decent enough
 > but the *mountain* of french fries were a huge turnoff as
 > were the plates, emblazoned with the "ettas" logo. Reminded
 > me of being at a coffee shop and I was immediately turned
 > off by the lack of ambience. We ordered dessert, more out
 > of curiosity than desire for more, and what we received
 > (again on "Etta's" plates) was semi-sweet chocolate fondue
 > with fruit and cookies. The coffee came in Etta's mugs
 > as well.. However, the service was quite good... This place
 > isn't terrible by any means but I don't believe that the
 > food supports the reputation this place has... I later
 > tried "Palace Kitchen", another of Tom Douglas' restaurants
 > and wasn't impressed either. What are others' comments on
 > "Palace Kitchen"?
 >
 > sasha

 I've been to the Palace Kitchen twice for dinner and have not been
 impressed. Its not that the food is inferior to that of other restaurants
 its just not remarkable. I last ate there a month ago and couldn't tell
 you what I had to eat. Nothing I had made me sit up and moan with
 pleasure that can only happen when something wonderful has passed
 over your tastebuds. I will probably try it one more time but not
 on a weekend. It can get really loud. Also the booths have hard wooden
 seats which are not comfortable.
Share this page