H. C. wrote: > > how is the harold's on howard, anyway? i heard it's not as good, but then > that comment could've been from someone who never ate at harold's in the > first place (i'll admit it took time for my stomach to adjust to the > interesting ingredients found in a white half with everything). I've found it to be pretty good. I've alweays found the quality of their chicken to be very good: large, meaty pieces. Of course, it's been quite a while since I've eaten the stuff regularly, so perhaps I don't know what I'm talking about anymore. But I doubt it. It's *definitely* better than The Chicken Shack in Evanston, tho.
Chicago, IL