Skip to main content
The Kitchen Archive

Eats Archive › California › Los Angeles

Los Angeles, CA

NYC HAS THE BEST REST

1 post · Feb 23, 1998

Aaron P.California Institute of Technology, PasadenaFeb 23, 1998
On Mon, 16 Feb 1998, Michael S. wrote:

> Thomas S. wrote:
> >
> > > no  city in the US even comes close to food eateries in NYC
>
> As a San Francisco foodie,  I have to say that LA is right up
> there with NY and SF.  I have yet to eat in a Chinese restaurant
> anywhere that compares with Yujean Kang's (Melrose nr Robertson),
> and I sure miss their Albany place!
>
> And I thought Mimosa (W. Beverly) was great - as they say, "no foie
> gras or caviar, just good French food."
>
> Patina (Melrose) is super.
>
> I wouldn't trade Chez Panisse for any of them,  but there are
> many restaurants in LA that merit a detour.

As a former LA resident who now lives on the east coast, I concur.  I think LA has more excellent restaurants in every price category than anywhere else I've been.  Some things I really miss:

Shiro -- world class fish
lunch at Yujean Kang (the original, in Pasadena--a weekly pilgrimage) Californa brunch, open-air at Julienne, or pseudo-open-air at Campanile great central american and cuban food--Versailles, Zumaya the best collection of dim sum houses in America--NBC, Ocean Star, etc. many great Thai restaurants--Basil's, Saladang, Torung Peet's coffee (only non-Bay Area location is in Pasadena) easy access to Chez Panisse :)

On the east coast, you can get equally good food from a number of places, but you're generally going to pay a lot more for it.  There just aren't many places you can get an excellent, interesting, flavorful dinner for under $10.  But in LA there were many great options in that range-- especially in the ethnic communities.

--Aaron
Share this page