Little Tokyo, sushi = 2.25 out of 5 | Sushi

Kang Z.Masters student, Industrial Administration - 3rd Yr. Opt., Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PAMay 25, 1997

Went to L.T. last weekend for Sushi:
Ratings:
Fish -fresh, good portion, but not a lot of selection [ 3+ out of 5] Sushi -rice was not sticky and not marinated properly. It was just a big ball of rice which disintegrated in the soya sauce. [2 of 5]

Note: they do have other stuff there and the place is nice and clean, but the fact that they did not even have a clue about how to do sushi bothers me. It does not give me the impression they are a very professional sushi place.

OVERALL - 2.25 out of 5 for sushi and sashimi

KZ

AnonymousUniversity of PittsburghMay 25, 1997

Kang Z. wrote:
> Went to L.T. last weekend for Sushi:
> Ratings:
> Fish -fresh, good portion, but not a lot of selection [ 3+ out of 5]
> Sushi -rice was not sticky and not marinated properly. It was just a big
> ball of rice which disintegrated in the soya sauce. [2 of 5]

What's "a lot of selection"?  I was there a few days ago, and they had at least 20 or so pieces available.  And I didn't have any problems with the rice staying together -- how long did you soak it in the sauce?

> Note: they do have other stuff there and the place is nice and clean,
> but the fact that they did not even have a clue about how to do sushi
> bothers me. It does not give me the impression they are a very
> professional sushi place.
>
> OVERALL - 2.25 out of 5 for sushi and sashimi

Your numbers mean nothing without context.  The important question is how LT compares with the other sushi restaurants in Pittsburgh, not with "5."

Nick